Moderator
NB Posts : 3631
Created :
Last visit :
User signature : 
Firebird (ma ludothèque)
T7Continent :
DV, OG, LG --- 
SI, [CD+SI] --- 
Histoire, Pénitence, Funéraille --- 
[SI+TS]
T7Citadel :
Firebird (ma ludothèque)T7Continent :
DV, OG, LG --- SI, [CD+SI] --- Histoire, Pénitence, Funéraille --- [SI+TS]T7Citadel :
|
Note for the shortest path (directly to
north from the Citadel This is possible only if you find the access in a previous scenario, because it takes some time to have a path available So I don't think that you can use it in your case. I try a schema  Dada -----------------
.....|x..............|
Ci -------------------
Effectivement ça semble peu justifié d'avoir un "sens d'exploration" à cet endroit là. Ce genre de sens unique peut exister mais là, le doute est permis.
Bien vu. Merci de ton retour ! Note cependant qu'une fois les 2 cartes Terrain en jeu, le déplacement est possible de l'un à l'autre dans les 2 sens. L'absence de   n'impacte que la découverte initiale des terrains.
Fixed : Exploration.
Pas "exploitation", vil nécrodruide !!  --- Je vous rejoins sur l'impression que le jeu est meilleur en solo-1-perso que en solo-multi-perso. Mais je trouve le jeu bien plus calibré pour du multijoueur que 7e Continent, donc je n'irai pas jusqu'à dire qu'il est meilleur en solo. On s'amuse bien avec mon épouse ! 
Joli projet EEric !
 Je ne pense pas qu'il y ait le moindre problème dans ce que tu me décris. Sous réserve que Serious Poulp intervienne à l'avenir pour cadrer plus précisément, bien sûr. Gardons ce sujet pour les informations "juridiques". Je t'invite à ouvrir un sujet dédié pour ton projet lorsque tu voudras le partager.  
Pour The 7th Continent, il y a un Fan kit mis à disposition par Serious Poulp qui impose à son usagé d'accepter la charte (incluant l'affichage de l'icone officielle "Fan made").
Pour The 7th Citadel, malgré quelques éléments disponibles, il n'y a pas (encore ?) de kit de ce genre. Les productions fan-made sont donc moins encadrées mais se doivent bien sûr de respecter la loi. Ca me parait une bonne idée de s'inspirer très fortement de la charte de T7Continent : Au final, le mieux est de faire preuve de transparence et de venir partager sur ce forum vos créations !  On a hâte !
You're right : there's no difference between returning the Past when you save or when you load your game.
Maybe the authors prefer to explain a very fast save functionality (marketing reason) ? Maybe it' the way they prefer to play at home after an loooong session of adventure : spleeping 15 minutes sooner ?
Salut BranBran01
Je n'ai pas expérimenté le mode solo pour l'instant, donc je ne saurais pas vraiment te répondre. Les 2 options sont des choix qui se valent, selon le style que tu préfères, je dirais. Avec plusieurs persos, il faut sans cesse se demander qui réalise l'action pour savoir quel inventaire est accessible (en cas d'évènements en conséquence à gérer) et qui sont les participants. Il est facile d'oublier et de "tricher" en se disant "oui mais en fait, c'est l'autre qui a fait ça". Je pense que je ferai du vrai solo à 1 perso pour m'éviter ça. Question : pourquoi tu parles de la partie à 3 avec une autre boîte ? Ca a une implication sur ta partie solo ?
The rule which prohibits 2 simultaneous Actions is the most important.
Example (too complicated compared to the game  ):An action X results in: Card-A card-B  1
Irgy wrote: "Blacksmith" A0065 has no instruction to discard it, so fails the "(if indicated)" condition in Sarah's statement. Can I therefore play Blacksmith to save 2 energy on a check, then play Brooks' "Save your energy" and discard "Blacksmith", even though the second effect on Blacksmith is still pending? + Irgy wrote: Am I able to voluntarily decline to gain the pending effects from an ability in order to block/discard a card sooner? According to my understanding, we can't decide to decline an effect. We only may apply a null effect instead. ==> That's make the card in a "played" state until the last step of theses effects is over. At this moment, it's time to discard/block this card if asked, or to return it to a "non-player, available" state. I hope this use of states isn't too confuse but it's the best way I've found to explain. Your example/ - I play Blacksmith (Image of the card   then the card stay in my Hand as a "played" card, waiting for the "Result" step.- I play Brooks' "Save your energy" (Image of the card  then, as the effect is finished, I apply the last sentence as a cost. Here, IMO, you must choose an "non-played" card. "Blacksmith" is not an option. However, "Save your energy" is now an "non-played" card so you can discard it (or another non-played card).- At the Result step, you may not use Blacksmith for its conversion effect. Now, Blacksmith has the state of "non-played" card. Another example could be the sames cards played in another order / - I play Brooks' "Save your energy" (Image of the card then, as the effect is finished, I apply the last sentence as a cost. Here, I may choose Blacksmith.- After that, there's no Blacksmith card in my Hand to reduce the cost of the Action. Irgy wrote: Page 19 of the rulebook says "You can discard IMO, the rule could be : "You can discard  non-played cards from your hand into your discard pile at any time".It' a rule to allow the player to manage his hand's size. Nothing more. So, yes, the Sarah's text add to you a discarding optimization, but it's not in conflit with the rule (as I completed it). Your questions push me to my analytical limits. And, I'm sorry, but SP is overwhelmed by work for the next KS campain. 
Braxus wrote: Some skill cards I receive the confirmation from Sarah (and Bruno, the author). As we conclude, Un effet d'une carte ne peut être utilisé qu'une fois par séquence. Translation ==> A card effect can only be used once per sequence. Discarding a for an effect is a [kind of] cost that can only be paid once.
Nouveau visuel (Facebook) !
Irgy wrote: Thanks for the response, but this answer is only going as far as telling me what I already knew. My main purpose was to argue that it should be reconsidered. But, if I accept it as given, the implications still have some uncertainty that I feel is not answered by this reply. Your proposal to reconsider this rule clarification has already been studied by the author before. But the other solutions generated other problems. The choice is therefore the one stated by Sarah. Irgy wrote: Can I confirm then that I can discard card A to pay for another ability on card B, even though I have already activated an ability on card A which will result in card A being discarded, such as described in the example with Endurance? Thereby paying the cost of both cards with just card A. Sarah's last sentence in her rule gives an implicit instruction (which she confirmed to me): the discarding of a played card ONLY occurs during this timing (end of effects or 4B step). Voluntary discarding from another card is prohibited. Irgy wrote: Can I get clarification on what happens if a card is discarded (either to another card's ability, or to text in the consequence step) before all of the effects have been applied? Can the remaining effects still be applied? This case is not possible*. According to Sarah's rule, the played card cannot be absent with its effect not yet applied. The discard arrives after the application of the effects or in 4B step (after ).Irgy wrote: If the answer to the above is that remaining effects cannot be applied, does this also apply to instructions such as blocking the card? Not applicable. Irgy wrote: Can I confirm that Denhom's and Arthen's "Determination" is still discarded during the gear up step, despite that being inconsistent with the statement that " A played card is discarded (if indicated) as soon as all its effects have been used, or otherwise at the end of the complete action resolution sequence."? These 2 cards have a text that applies in priority to Sarah's rule, as required by the golden rule (the card takes precedence over the rule). * In the other answer, you talked about Consequence step : if a   ask to discard, you discard. But I think a effect should be write before the "Discard the card" sentence, no ? Which imply that you keep the Consequence in memory until the effect is finish. ==> If you have a specific case, please create a topic : there's maybe an exception but the rule stay valid.I hope that it's more clear now.
Note: In this topic, we use the term “cost” to talk about the inconvenience that a card requires you to pay to use its effect.
This is not the correct definition of Cost in the rule.We have therefore not talked about the cost of an Action.
jujulautre wrote: Do you have an example of such a card ? We discuss together on Discord about this. But I copy here 2 examples of cards. There are Advanced Skills so I put Medium spoiler tag. 1/ Here, with multiple activation, we should be able to reduce cost by -2-2-2-2...  2/ Here, with multiple activation, we should be able to use 4 or more class icons, over the Max.3 limit.  |
###.
Y action will be the next one to resolve.