Moderator
NB Posts : 3675
Created :
Last visit :
User signature : 
Firebird (ma ludothèque)
T7Continent :
DV, OG, LG --- 
SI, [CD+SI] --- 
Histoire, Pénitence, Funéraille --- 
[SI+TS]
T7Citadel :
Firebird (ma ludothèque)T7Continent :
DV, OG, LG --- SI, [CD+SI] --- Histoire, Pénitence, Funéraille --- [SI+TS]T7Citadel :
|
Irgy wrote: Thanks for the response, but this answer is only going as far as telling me what I already knew. My main purpose was to argue that it should be reconsidered. But, if I accept it as given, the implications still have some uncertainty that I feel is not answered by this reply. Your proposal to reconsider this rule clarification has already been studied by the author before. But the other solutions generated other problems. The choice is therefore the one stated by Sarah. Irgy wrote: Can I confirm then that I can discard card A to pay for another ability on card B, even though I have already activated an ability on card A which will result in card A being discarded, such as described in the example with Endurance? Thereby paying the cost of both cards with just card A. Sarah's last sentence in her rule gives an implicit instruction (which she confirmed to me): the discarding of a played card ONLY occurs during this timing (end of effects or 4B step). Voluntary discarding from another card is prohibited. Irgy wrote: Can I get clarification on what happens if a card is discarded (either to another card's ability, or to text in the consequence step) before all of the effects have been applied? Can the remaining effects still be applied? This case is not possible*. According to Sarah's rule, the played card cannot be absent with its effect not yet applied. The discard arrives after the application of the effects or in 4B step (after  ).Irgy wrote: If the answer to the above is that remaining effects cannot be applied, does this also apply to instructions such as blocking the card? Not applicable. Irgy wrote: Can I confirm that Denhom's and Arthen's "Determination" is still discarded during the gear up step, despite that being inconsistent with the statement that " A played card is discarded (if indicated) as soon as all its effects have been used, or otherwise at the end of the complete action resolution sequence."? These 2 cards have a text that applies in priority to Sarah's rule, as required by the golden rule (the card takes precedence over the rule). * In the other answer, you talked about Consequence step : if a   ask to discard, you discard. But I think a effect should be write before the "Discard the card" sentence, no ? Which imply that you keep the Consequence in memory until the effect is finish. ==> If you have a specific case, please create a topic : there's maybe an exception but the rule stay valid.I hope that it's more clear now. 
Note: In this topic, we use the term “cost” to talk about the inconvenience that a card requires you to pay to use its effect.
This is not the correct definition of  Cost in the rule.We have therefore not talked about the cost of an Action.
jujulautre wrote: Do you have an example of such a card ? We discuss together on Discord about this. But I copy here 2 examples of cards. There are Advanced Skills so I put Medium spoiler tag. 1/ Here, with multiple activation, we should be able to reduce cost by -2-2-2-2...  2/ Here, with multiple activation, we should be able to use 4 or more class icons, over the Max.3 limit. 
Hello Marcus,
Welcome here ! The more you will spend "Hope" for some Advanced skills, the more you will have cards that generates bonus with Class icons.And of course, the more you find  Items, the more you will have this type of effect.There's a moment (mid-Theart ?) when you should be happy to draw Class icons to activate all your stuff. 
The rule is the rule.
Weight must be taken into account. BUT you can choose to play with a roleplaying variation. It's not a big issue.
Je ne suis pas un expert du domaine mais j'ai souvenir de commentaires qui rappelaient, à juste titre, que les Frais de port ne couvrent pas que la logistique de transport, mais aussi le coût du stockage (entrepôts) et de services (lorsque c'est sous-traité comme ici à divers prestataires), plus les assurances.
Peut-être que la situation d'un éditeur en autodiffusion (Boutique SP) n'est pas vraiment comparable à celle d'une boutique en ligne ou d'un site d'occasion qui mutualisent leurs moyens sur une échelle bien plus grosse ? En tout cas, je note tout de même que les FDP sont offerts à partir de 50€ d'achat (boutique SP France). Et ça, c'est plus que correct. Mode Modo : Je me suis permis d'éditer le sujet pour un titre plus parlant je crois.
Bonjour Yves
Comme je l'ai indiqué ici, le statut [confirmé] ne présage pas forcément de la mise en ligne d'un errata. Typiquement, lorsqu'il s'agit d'une typo qui n'a pas ou peu d'incidence sur le jeu, la correction sera pris en compte uniquement pour une réédition du jeu. Tu peux écouter Bruno en parler brièvement dans son interview (lien horodaté vers le passage en question) Pour cette carte 110 en particulier, je ne sais pas ce qui sera décidé cependant. 
Je confirme que chez moi, l'application installée fonctionne toujours mais que je ne trouve plus l'application dans Play store via la gestion de mes applis, ni via le lien direct
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=be.seriouspoulp.the7thcontinent  Je fais remonter l'info, Revonsdebou. Tu peux aussi utiliser le formulaire de SAV si tu le souhaites.
EEric wrote: Il n'y a pas d'erratum anglais pour la carte 199, ça veut dire que c'était vraiment un typo qui existait en français mais pas en anglais? Et oui! Une bête coquille apparemment ! 
Bonjour Henkin
Je vais remonter ta proposition. Mais je crois qu'elle sera refusé pour 3 raisons que je trouve légitime :
|
